26 June 2006

Stained Testimony


The Christian community has been holding up Brittany McComb as an example of suffering and taking a stand for Christ. She had been awarded the title of Valedictorian and had the opportunity to speak at her high school graduation. She submitted a script of her speech at the school's request, which was edited and given back to her. They told her that she could not make references to God and Christ because it was a school endorsed function and thus could not promote a single religion, promising her that if she did that they would turn off her microphone. She agreed to give the edited speech. But when she actually gave the speech she recited the full, unedited manuscript. The school officials then killed her microphone. For more information and some videos, click here.

Many people, youth and adult alike, are applauding Brittany for her testimony for Christ. In the face of opposition (the school board), she dared to take the risk and talk about the the impact that Jesus Christ had in her life. Although I don't think that the school did the right thing by turning off her mic, I don't think that Brittany was entirely in the right.

What do unbelievers think when they see this girl who claims to be a Christian, who rebels against authority, and who goes back on her word? She said that she would give the unedited speech, but then without informing anyone, gave the other one instead. So, the very mouth that said that Christ was her greatest influence, lied directly in the face of her authority.

I understand that we must disobey our earthly authority if it is commanding us to disobey our heavenly authority, but you must decide which one you are going to obey. Don't switch your allegience half-way through. Show from start to finish that you answer only to God.

5 Comments:

At Tuesday, 27 June, 2006, Blogger Dan said...

When I read that news story I thought the same thing--I agree with the issue of submitting to authority. And I noticed she'll be coming to my brother's college, Biola.

 
At Wednesday, 28 June, 2006, Blogger Ben Blakey said...

Micah-

Just came across your blog from your Facebook today. Great blogging going on here. You're definitely right on in this post. When the apostles were told to shut up by the religious leaders, they were straight up and said they had to talk about Jesus. We should do the same.

 
At Thursday, 29 June, 2006, Anonymous Bryan Kirby said...

A better option might have been to change topics and speak about the fast-fleeting freedom in our country to believe anything is actually true-truth. I think you're right, lieing probably wasn't warrented in this case.

 
At Wednesday, 05 July, 2006, Blogger Caleb Kolstad said...

good post-

 
At Wednesday, 05 July, 2006, Blogger Salikah said...

Micah, as I began reading this post that was my first thought: for someone calling on God to go back on their promise is a contradictory act indeed.

A question for you (and your readers), as a non-Christian that is devout to her own faith and very respectful of those who are devout to theirs (even if I don't agree with them, those genuinely religious often share common morals and values), I always find that when people go out on a public sphere and start to specifically call on Jesus and thank him, it isolates me from them because as much as I love Jesus the Prophet, I don't believe he is God.

At the same time, I'm a teacher in a public highschool and two fellow teachers who I'm friends with and respect dearly are very devout Christians and we often talk about faith -- if someone is addressing an audience that is not entirely Christian (or in an institution that is not Christian), why the dogmatic approach of "I must declare my love for Jesus"? Why not just keep it to a generic "GOD" and let people make of that what they will (and I'm sure her classmates would know what God meant for her)?

It's not being ashamed of your religion, but it welcomes people to it rather than isolating them...

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home